<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civil Society Coalition on Climate Change &#187; climate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csccc.info/tag/climate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csccc.info</link>
	<description>Educating the public about the science and economics of climate change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Green tariffs make no sense</title>
		<link>http://csccc.info/2010/05/green-tariffs-make-no-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://csccc.info/2010/05/green-tariffs-make-no-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 10:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>content_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alec van gelder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caroline boin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csccc.info/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TAXING carbon-heavy imports is uneconomic and won't help the climate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csccc.info/2010/05/green-tariffs-make-no-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women &#8216;bearing brunt&#8217; of climate change</title>
		<link>http://csccc.info/2009/11/women-bearing-brunt-of-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://csccc.info/2009/11/women-bearing-brunt-of-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>content_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNFPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csccc.info/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics said that conflating population control with efforts to tackle climate change was overly simplistic. Caroline Boin, an analyst at London-based think tank International Policy Network, also said the report was patronizing to women in the developing world. &#8220;Whatever the problem, UNFPA repeats the same old mantra &#8212; the culprit is population and the solution [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csccc.info/2009/11/women-bearing-brunt-of-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binding Emissions Targets are “Eco-protectionism” says Civil Society</title>
		<link>http://csccc.info/2008/02/binding-emissions-targets-are-%e2%80%9ceco-protectionism%e2%80%9d-says-civil-society/</link>
		<comments>http://csccc.info/2008/02/binding-emissions-targets-are-%e2%80%9ceco-protectionism%e2%80%9d-says-civil-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>content_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emission targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csccc.info/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Driven by vested interests, this policy is hypocritical and will perpetuate poverty.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csccc.info/2008/02/binding-emissions-targets-are-%e2%80%9ceco-protectionism%e2%80%9d-says-civil-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adaptation Doesn’t Need Aid, say Civil Society Groups</title>
		<link>http://csccc.info/2007/12/adaptation-doesn%e2%80%99t-need-aid-say-civil-society-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://csccc.info/2007/12/adaptation-doesn%e2%80%99t-need-aid-say-civil-society-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>content_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csccc.info/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday, 10 December 2007, Bali, Indonesia: At the UN Climate meeting this week in Bali, ‘development’ NGOs, international agencies and some poor countries have claimed that government money in the form of ‘foreign aid’ channelled from wealthy countries to poor countries is the best way to create ‘adaptation’ to combat the effects of climate change. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csccc.info/2007/12/adaptation-doesn%e2%80%99t-need-aid-say-civil-society-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulation, Aid Not Solution to Climate Change – Report</title>
		<link>http://csccc.info/2007/12/regulation-aid-not-solution-to-climate-change-%e2%80%93-report/</link>
		<comments>http://csccc.info/2007/12/regulation-aid-not-solution-to-climate-change-%e2%80%93-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>content_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csccc.info/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report* to be released on Monday December 3rd, produced by 42 institutes from around the world, concludes: Cutting greenhouse gas emissions in the coming two decades is not a cost-effective way to address climate change. Deaths from climate related natural disasters have fallen dramatically since the 1920s, as a result of economic growth [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csccc.info/2007/12/regulation-aid-not-solution-to-climate-change-%e2%80%93-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

